雅思作文test1

1.求雅思剑桥9的test1大作文的翻译

Children's education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents' responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective.

On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted.

On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc.

2.求雅思剑桥9的test1大作文的翻译

Children's education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents' responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective. On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted. On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc.。

3.剑桥雅思7test1表格作文,希望高手予以批改,20分不多,但保证送出

The data indicates that consumer spending on different items from five different countries in 2002,including Ireland,Italy,Spain,Sweden,and Turkey.The first section consists of Food,Drinks,and Tobacco.Specially,Turkey is accounted in 32.14% and Turkey spends more money on Food,Drinks,Tocbacco than other countries.The statistics from Italy,Spain,and Sweden were similar in the first section.Accroding to the data,the second section is made up of Clothing and Footwear.9% from Italy is the highest percentage and the lowest percentage is Sweden.The third section is Leisure and Education.The percentage of Italy and Sweden are 3.20% and 3.22%.Turkey spends money on Leisure and Education is 4.35% which is the highest percentage in the third section.As the table shown,most people would like to spend more money on Food,Drinks,and Tobacco and spend less money on Leisure and Education.修改完毕！请LZ给分吧 ⊙﹏⊙。

4.谁有2019年2月14日雅思大作文真题参考

2019年2月14日雅思大作文题目新技术改变了孩子们的玩耍方式，这是好还是坏？New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages？解析&审题本题中有三个关键词，即new technologies,children,spend their free time，要求讨论“新技术改变了孩子们玩耍的方式，这是好还是坏？”在构思本题的时候，我们首先需要说清楚的是：哪些新技术？怎么样改变了孩子们玩耍的方式？然后讨论这种改变是好还是坏。

当然，我们也要提醒自己，本题的重点是讨论“这种改变是好还是坏？”说到“新技术”，我们立马会想到电脑，网络，智能手机。雅思考试写作经常要求考生讨论这样的题目“有了新技术，人们是否还需要去博物馆，去上学，去图书馆，去公司上班”，这是要求考生讨论新技术给人们的学习和生活带来的影响。

本题其实与这些题目是异曲同工的：有了新技术，孩子们怎么玩耍？那么，新技术如何改变孩子们玩耍的方式呢？我们需要提炼出2-3个“玩耍新方式”，在接下来重点讨论起优劣势的时候才能有基础。这里其实涉及到一个比较的问题。

没有新技术的时候，孩子们一般喜欢在一起做各种游戏，或者安静地阅读，而网络手机的广泛使用，则让孩子们整天独自打电子游戏，或者浏览各种社交媒体信息。于是，我们可以归纳出新技术给孩子玩耍方式造成的两个影响：（1）从真实的集体游戏转变为虚拟的网上游戏；（2）从阅读书籍到紧盯手机或电脑。

这样，我们接下来的讨论就相对容易了。我们可以讨论这种变化的消极影响：首先，紧盯手机和电脑会给孩子的身体带来不良影响（数据表明，中小学生近视的比例已经达到惊人的70%），其次，过多沉浸在虚拟世界容易让孩子们产生孤独感，失去解决真实世界中各种问题的能力（比如人际交往能力，领导能力等）。

这样写，大家是否觉得思路是很清晰的？接下来，请大家阅读唐老师的高分，看以上思路是如何具体反映到字里行间的。老师笔记01The widespread use of new technologies such as the Internet,computers,and smart phones has fundamentally changed the way children spend their free time.In the past,most children wouldengage in outdoor activities such as hiking,playing hide-and-seek,flying kites,to name only a few.Those who enjoyed reading for pleasure would stay indoors and read print books such as classical novels,children's stories,and comic books.The situation is quite different now.The great majority of children today spend their spare time online,playing video games,listening to music,and browsing around in the social media of all kinds.In my view,this new development has more downside risks.互联网、电脑和智能手机等新技术的广泛应用，从根本上改变了儿童利用空闲时间的方式。

在过去，大多数儿童都会从事户外活动，如远足，玩捉迷藏，放风筝，等等。那些喜欢读书的人会待在家里，读一些印刷书籍，如经典小说，儿童故事和漫画书。

现在情况完全不同了。今天，绝大多数孩子都把业余时间花在网上，玩电子游戏，听音乐，在各种社交媒体上闲逛。

在我看来，这一新趋势有更多不利的风险。解析（1）本段讨论新技术如何改变了儿童利用空闲时间的方式。

本段采用的是比较法：过去。

而现在。

（2）widespread广泛的（3）fundamentally从根本上地（4）engage in从事（5）to name only a few仅举几个例子；诸如此类；等等（6）the great majority of。

绝大多数的。

（7）browse around四处闲看（8）downside risks不利的风险02Though it does make children's life more interesting,and help them obtain information in a faster and more convenient way,the Internet also makes children easily addicted to it.The violent gun-fighting games,for example,appeal to children so much that some of them will spend hours and hours playing them.The cost is really high.The children's performance at school becomes worse and worse,and their health also suffers.A recent study indicates that globally,the Internet games are responsible for 70%middle school students who are shortsighted.虽然互联网确实使儿童的生活更有趣，并帮助他们以更快和更方便的方式获取信息，但互联网也使孩子们很容易对它上瘾。比如暴力枪战游戏对孩子们有很大的吸引力，以至于他们中的一些人会几个小时几个小时地玩这些游戏。

这样做的成本真的很高。孩子们在学校的表现越来越差，而且健康也受到损害。

最近的一项研究表明，在全球范围内，网络游戏造成70%的中学生近视。解析（1）本段论述把时间花在网络游戏上的第一种坏处：学习和身体受损。

论述方法包括举例和引用研究数据。（2）be addicted to。

沉迷于。

（3）appeal to。吸引（4）globally全球范围内（5）be responsible for。

为。

负责；导致。

03Worse still,too much time spent facing the computer or smart phone may result in children's isolation from the actual world.In the traditional games,children could learn 。

5.雅思作文

The production and transportation of food has been greatly changed by modern technology. To what extent do you think this is a positive or a negative development? It is undeniable that the advancement of modern technology has given rise to countless changes of the production and transportation of food. While a host of people argue that the modern industrialization of food supply owes an explanation to the consumers of the products which have caused numerous controversies over the reliability and negative effects they may have on their consumers, I feel much obliged to be supportive as well as critical of such plausible but emotional perspective. Food industry has never seen such a boost in producing and transporting of food with advanced technologies. However, even if technologies are seen neutral, the compromises they have been made to meet the demands of business or more precisely the maximization of profits have been extremely detrimental to the reputation of the specific technologies being used. For instance, the junk food they provide in KFC, specifically the Nuggets. You don't even know which part of the chicken you are eating, for the machines have made it impossible for us mere mortals to distinguish the ingredients from the shape and smell of the product. More significantly, the way it is made, transported and served is highly industrialized and standardized, that is to say, this kind of food is rather a product of the pursuit of profits than a nutritious meal intended for keeping people healthy and happy. The people who insist that the manufacturers of the products should take the full responsibility of the problems have unfortunately neglected the positive aspect of the modern production and transportation of food and other factors like lack of exercising which may well contribute to their conditions. The efficiency of reallocating resources against its scarcity to the demands of humans as a whole has always been an unassailable reply to the questioning of modern capitalism and industrialization. And admittedly healthiness is not solely connected to the intake of food. One's exercising plan may carry more weight than his or her diet. Based on the elaboration of the argument, a conclusion can be easily made that food changes are less favorable when we compared with traditional diets, whereas they could be more welcomed if we be wiser when we start to appreciate the value of economic efficiency and balance our diets with regular workouts.。

6.雅思大作文

楼主，你好，我这里有一篇雅思大作文，相信对你有用。

雅思作文高分：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？ 本文是一篇8分的雅思作文高分，文章中有许多的高分句型以及运用的恰到好处的高分词组、词汇，文章的题目是：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？现将译文及分享给大家，希望对备考雅思的朋友能够有所帮助。 中文标题：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？ 译文如下： 在当代社会，似乎职业工作这在提高生产力，并给其他人提供直接的服务，而在体育和娱乐方面的名人没有做出此等贡献。

因此，有人认为职业工作者应该比明星得到更多的报酬。然而，我不同意他们的意见，原因如下。

职业工作者个人对社会的贡献不像名人那么多。任何一个职业工作者不像体育或是娱乐名人那样能够在专业领域给大众带来快乐。

并且，同样地，单个职业雇员不能够给国家带来荣耀，也不能提升人们的名族归属感。否则，他们能够做到的话，报酬就不会少。

职业工作者（如医生、护士和老师等）的能够使可以被训练和复制的，而明人的天赋是不可以的。一个普通人能够通过受教育和训练去做那些专业的工作，但是，没有那么的人通过受教育和训练能够打篮球打得像姚明一样好，也没有那么多人跳舞能够跳舞跳得想杰克逊那也好。

此外，缺少的一个职业专家能被另一人所代替，而缺少一位名人可能会导致某一领域发展的限制。 不可否认，由于大量的人们在专业领域工作并且直接服务于大众，他们看起来，至少表面上是与公众的生活水平的提升有着更加亲密的联系。

然而，在这个信息时代，当人们更多地关注与精神生活并且能比较单间的获取必要信息时，职业工作者所创造的价值就没有名人所创造的价值高。 总之，我不同意职业工作者应该比体育和娱乐名人的工资高的观点。

只有当一个人的价值通过其对社会的全面贡献来衡量的时候，社会每个领域才能得到全面的发展。本文源自雅思救星。

英文标题：Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 如下： It seems that, in this society, professional workers are improving the productivity and providing direct service to others, while celebrities in sports and entertainment are not making such contributions. Therefore, some people claim a higher pay for the former over the latter. However, I would show my disagreement to their statement for the following reasons. Professional workers do not contribute so much to society as celebrities in person. Any single worker in the professional field is not able to bring the happiness to such a large population as a famous person in sports or entertainment does. Also, an individual professional employee cannot similarly bring glories to the country and enhance people's sense of belongings to the nation. Otherwise, if they can, their payment will not be less. Unlike the talents in celebrities that are invaluable, the abilities of professional workers, such as doctors, nurses and teachers can be trained and copied. An ordinary person can be educated or trained to be engaged in those professional jobs, but not so many can be taught to play basketball so well as Yaomin and dance so gracefully as Jackson. Besides, the lack of a professional worker can be soon replaced by another one, while the loss of a celebrity may result in the limit of development in a certain field. Admittedly, due to the large population of people working in professional fields and the direct service people receive from them, they may seem, at least superficially, be more closely related to the improvement of the life level of the public. However, in this information age when people are attaching more importance to their spiritual life and easier in obtaining information needed, the value produced by professional workers is not so high as that brought by the celebrities. To sum up, I do not agree with the idea for professional workers to earn a higher salary than the sports and entertainment personalities. Only when a man's value is measured by his overall contribution to society, can every field in the world be developed to its full.。

7.雅思小作文批改（剑5test1）

The graph illustrates the dramatic comparison of the population proportion aged 65 and over from year 1940 to 2040 in three countries.

In Japan, it's population proportion started in the year of 1940 at a tendency of going from 5% to approximate 3% in 1960, followed by a stable trend before restarting to the original level in year 2000.

In view of Sweden and USA, which both countries demonstrate a constantly increasing movement of the population, started itself from 7% and 9% to 16% and 14% respectively during the same period as Japan.

It is worth mention that the expected proportions in three countries, especially Japan are blessed with a noticeable rising of population, which raised sharply to 27% over the last two decades. As to the other countries, Sweden and USA have all experienced a moderate increase in population by hitting to 25% and 24% each, although Sweden suffered from a little turbulence in years from 2000 to 2020.

楼主英文水平很好，接近西方的结构写作，但语法稍微注意一下，有个别词汇还是要了解一下运用的方法，（英文同义单词很多，但写作时每个都有不同的用途）。还有尽量不要写数字，像 3 countries 要写成 three countries 看起来会比较正式一点。

我尽量改的都改了，也不会是完全对，只给LZ一个参考。